LATEST NEWS

Thursday, June 7, 2012

TTPK in opposition to invite to Sri Lanka!



Representatives of 19 political parties, Tamils rights groups and few activists congregated in front of the British Deputy High Commission in Chennai on Wednesday to protest against the invitation to Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa to attend the British Queen’s Diamond Jubilee celebrations next week in London.
The protestors also presented a petition to the Deputy High Commissioner urging Britain to withdraw the invitation and expel Sri Lanka from the Commonwealth of Nations.
“In the light of credible allegations by the UN, we Tamils demand that the UK government, as an esteemed defender of human rights, should take the lead role in urging the international community to bring Mr Rajapaksa to justice for his explicit crimes against humanity,” the memorandum said.
Among the leaders who participated in the protest were Mallai Sathya of MDMK, Ki Venkatraman of Tamil Desiya Pothuvudamai Katchi, Dheeran of Tamilaka Vaalvurimai Katchi, Mahendiran of CPI, Haroon Rashid of Manithaneya Makkal Katchi, Se Packiyarajan of Naam Tamilar Iyakkam,  Paventhan of Tamil Nationalist Front, Thabasi Kumaran of Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam, Prof Sarasvathi of Friends of TGTE, film director Pugalenthi, Thirumurugan and Prof Purushothaman of MAY 17 Movement.

Friday, May 18, 2012

Events across Tamil Nadu mark Mullivaikkal massacre


Tamils honoured the victims of Mullivaikkal by lighting candles at remembrance events held across Tamil Nadu, including Coimbatore, Hosur, Tiruchi, Thanjavur, Saami Malai and Chidambaram.

The events, organised by the Tamil Desiya Pothu Udamai Katchi have been taking place over the past two days, with more planned. 

Tamil Nadu youth and student organisations took part in remembrance events in Chidambaram.

Organisers have announced that further events are taking place in Chennai this weekend. An event will be held in the T.Nagar region of Chennai on Saturday followed by a large event, at Marina Beach on Sunday, where the veteran political activist Pazha Nedumaran, MDMK General Secretary Vaiko, Tamil Desiya Pothu Udamai Katchi leader Mani Arasan, director Seeman, Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam leader Kolathur Mani and the leader of the May 17th Movement Thirumurugan will be participating.

Sunday, April 22, 2012

"There is no race called Dravidians" - Comrade P. Maniarasan




Identity Crisis
N ASOKAN | Issue Dated: April 22, 2012, New Delhi


The 100-year-old Dravidian movement is struggling to avoid fragmentation and new personalities, reports N Asokan

On February 27 this year when K Karunanidhi, the Dravida Munnetra Kazagham (DMK) patriarch kickstarted yearlong celebrations of the centenary of the Dravidian movement, he was livid.Taking the help of some typically colourful rhetoric which had once propelled him among the frontline of scriptwriters in the Tamil film industry, the former chief minister spoke strongly, "We are Tamils by language, Dravidians by race, Indians by country and humans by the world.” 

The cause of Karunanidhi's anger was a newspaper report on the same morning that had termed the Dravidian movement a bluff.

In the paper, K Sakthivel, a little-known political activist, had criticised the Dravidian movement as an illusion that had suppressed the rights of Tamils and helped the cause of non-Tamils in the state. Tamil identity and language have always been sensitive subjects, and back in the 1950s and 60s, were the catalysts for anti-Hindi demonstrations and riots in Tamil Nadu. Luckily for the country, it did not go beyond that but the seeds of projecting a separate and unique identity lay even further than the riots.

In 1962, in his maiden speech in the Rajya Sabha, DMK founder CN Annadurai, thundered, "I belong to the Dravidian stock. I am proud to call myself a Dravidian. That does not mean that I am against a Bengali or a Maharashtrian or a Gujarati. I say that I belong to the Dravidian stock and that is only because I consider that the Dravidians have got something concrete, something distinct, something different to offer to the nation at large”.

The speech had reverberations round the country and galvanised Tamil nationalism as never before. But the Dravidian movement, which started as essentially a non-Brahmin agitation in 1917 in the Madras presidency, has undergone many changes and withstood umpteen fissures and fragmentation in its 100-year-old history.

It is also a reflection of how times have changed. In its centenary year, DMK is the only political party to recognise and celebrate its centenary. Neither All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazagham (AIADMK), an offshoot and now bitter rival of the DMK, nor the DMDK, both parties that bear the Dravidian identity in their party names, have bothered to be involved. The only positive noises have come from Vaiko-led MDMK.

By a coincidence, in its 100th year the Dravidian ideology is under threat of dilution from a band of small Tamil nationalist political parties and it is no surprise that the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) led by Ramadoss has also given a helping hand to this increasing opposition.

Ramadoss, who has contested many elections along with Dravidian parties, has declared that he will never tie up with any Dravidian party in future and has attacked the 45-year Dravidian rule as creating neo-Brahmins while alienating Dalits, minorities and other socially and economically backward sections of society.

Away from the fire of Anna, Tamil nationalist parties highlight their Tamil identity saying that the word Dravidian, which includes Telugus, Malayalis and Kannadigas, did not help the Tamil cause after the reorganisation of states on the basis of languages in 1956.

Just how much is this dilution? P Maniarasan of the Tamil Nationalist Communist Party offers an explanation: "There is no race called Dravidians. It were the Aryans who referred to Tamils as Dravidians as they were unable to pronounce the word Tamil. In Tamil literature, there is no word called Dravidam. Academic evangelist Bishop Robert Caldwell while researching south Indian languages, coined the word 'Dravidian' to denote this family of languages. He sourced this word from Sanskrit.''

Political ideologues in Chennai fear that the Dravidian question will lead to a more fragmented Tamil Nadu. "The stand taken against Dravidian identity by people like Ramadoss, Seemaan (Naam Thamizhar Katchi), and K Sakthivel (Makkal Maanaadu Katchi) will only lead to a more divided Tamil Nadu,'' says analyst Viduthalai Rajendran.

He adds, "These leaders want to cross-examine EVR Periyar for the yeoman service he did to the Tamil community. Dravidian movement should be seen in the light of the social milieu of that period. A major section of Tamils were oppressed by the caste system under Brahmanism. Dravidian movement attacked the caste system and its fruits are evident. But these neo-Tamil nationalists are working to create a caste-based Tamil Nadu which even a common language will not be able to unite.''

Dalit writer and former MLA of Viduthalai Chiruthaikal Katchi provides a different perspective. He denounces both the Dravidan movement and Tamil identity politics. "The Justice Party, forebearer of the DMK dominated by rich Telugus, was against rights for Dalits. The original non-Brahmin movement was not interested in abolishing the caste divide. Have these leaders who speak about the Tamil identity instead of Dravidian identity, abandoned their own caste identities?'' Good question.

What is the future of this sudden eruption of Tamil identity voices? Scholars say that the politics of hatred is easy and simple to crank up but can neither gain respect nor produce good results. They could well be right, if 100 years of Dravidian politics is anything to go by.


Thursday, December 8, 2011

Malayalee shops picketed by TTPK in reaction to attack on Tamils in Kerala!


CHENNAI:  Sporadic attacks on commercial establishments owned by Malayalis in Tamil Nadu were reported from various parts of the state, prompting the police to act quickly by arresting the miscreants and also stepping up security measures on Wednesday. Jewellery showrooms, run by the different ‘Alukkas’ groups, were the common target in most of the places though small tea stalls, fruit juice shops and other establishments also faced the wrath of angry crowds.

In Chennai, Mohammed Ghouse, the manager of the shopping complex that came under attack at around 11.00 am, told ‘Express’ that the owner of the building, Mohammed Kutty, had come down from Kozhikode four decades ago and the four shops - a travel agency run by Kutty’s son, a tea stall, a restaurant and a bakery - had been doing brisk business facing no hostility from any quarters.

The six activists of Tamil Desiya Pothu Udamai Katchi (TDPUK), led by Arunabharathi, who attacked the shops after making enquires at the travel agency on the nativity of the owner, was subsequently arrested by the police.

The first incident in Coimbatore was at the commercial hub of Cross Cut Road around noon, when TDPUK cadre assembled in front of the Joyalukkas Jewellery and Khazana Jewellery and raised slogans demanding closure of the outlets.

Minor incident were also reported from Cuddalore, Kumbakonnam and Thanjavur

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Letter to ALBA countries in support of Tamil Eelam Tamils!



Amarantha, the founder of Latin American friendship association has written letter to ALBA countries urging them not to support Sri Lanka in UN for its war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the civil war. The letter pointed out the UN advisory panel confirmed that there were serious war crimes committed by the Sri Lankan military during the final stages of the war. Citing that the ALBA countries voted in favor of Sri Lankan state at the UNHRC on 27 May 2009, the letter insists that the ALBA countries should revise its stand on Sri Lanka. Below is the full text of the letter:

Latin American Friendship Association(LAFA),

No.176/10, Vaigai Veedhi, Municipal Colony Salai, Veerappan Chatram Post, Erode-638004.  Tamilnadu., India | Contact Phone:, +91-9445125379.,+919445125401, +91-9443307681.      

                                                                                                                                                                    Dated: 25.05.2011.

Maniyarasan - President - TTPK, 

Kurinji, 

Kochadai                       

Thiagu

K. Venkataraman - General Secretary - TTPK,

Aranga Gunasekaran

P. Thirunavukkarasu

A.J. Khan

Amarantha

Natarajan

Paamayan



Dear Comrades,

“Humanity is Homeland” said Jose Marti, poet, philosopher and Father of the Cuban Revolutionary war.

“The exploited, all over the world, are our compatriots; and exploiters all over the world our enemies… our country is really the whole world and all Revolutionaries of the world are our brothers” said Fidel Castro, Hero of the Cuban revolution who realized Marti’s dreams.

        Cuban doctors are at work among less fortunate people in many parts of the world.  Cuban medical teams are engaged in relief and rehabilitation work in various countries devastated by natural disasters.  More than 26,000 students from across the world study medicine free of cost at the Latin American School of Medicine in Havana promising to serve the poor and needy back home.

         But why did the present leaders of Cuba hail Sri Lanka for killing Eelam Tamils?  Why did they tow behind India in praising the Sri Lankan state at the UN Human Rights Council when tens of thousands of Eelam Tamils were killed in the gruesome war?  Are Eelam Tamils excluded from the Internationalism unique to Cuba?

         We at the Latin American Friendship Association consisting of Tamils of Tamil Nadu, India, were shocked and disheartened when the ALBA countries, at the insistence of Cuba, voted in favor of the Sri Lankan State at the UNHRC on 27 May, 2009.  It is now time for Cuba and other Latin American countries to correct their stand about Eelam Tamils in the light of the UN Advisory Panel Report on Sri Lanka, released on 25 April, 2011.

          Members of the U.N. Advisory Panel on Sri Lanka constituted by the Secretary General of U.N. Mr. Ban-ki-Moon, have confirmed the allegations of Tamils living across the world. The report confirms that more than 40,000 civilians were killed by heavy artillery and widespread shelling by Sri Lankan govt. forces; that there was systematic shelling on “No fire zones” including hospitals, schools, etc….  It strongly denies the Govt. of Sri Lanka’s claims of “Humanitarian…. Operation” with a policy of “zero civilian causalities” and indicates that a wide range of serious violations of International Humanitarian Laws and International Human Rights Laws were committed by the Govt. of Sri Lanka. Though it has been alleged that the LTTE had used civilians as human shields, recruited children in its cadre and stored weapons in civilian areas, the panel report accuses the Govt. of Sri Lanka of trampling on all International Humanitarian Laws.  Therefore, the panel has called upon the UN Security council to “reconsider the resolution passed by the UNHRC on 27 May 2009 in light of the Panel Report”.

          One may recall that the permanent People’s Tribunal, an international body independent of any state authority, after examining evidences and hearing eye-witnesses in Dublin in January 2010, concluded that the Sri Lankan government is guilty of War crimes and Crimes against Humanity and that the International community, particularly the U.K. and U.S.A., share responsibility for the breakdown of the peace process during 2002-2006. The tribunal comprised of renowned jurists, Nobel laureates including Rajinder Sachar, former chief justice of New Delhi High Court, Sulak Sivaraksa- a Buddhist Peace campaigner, writer, etc…  This People’s Tribunal was set up by the continuous efforts of the Tamil Diaspora, Tamils in Tamil Nadu and some Sinhala democrats..

           The Tribunal termed the civil war a “war without witnesses” because, the GoSL prevented entry of both National and International media into the war zone.  In fact, some of the early victims were journalists who were murdered by unknown assassins.   The atrocities carried out by the military relate particularly to civilians and there are evidences of cluster bombs being dropped by warplanes.  Sexual abuse and rape of women by government troops was yet another atrocity repeated throughout the civil war by govt. military in destroyed villages and in the “welfare villages”.  This led to tragedies such as abortions and suicide by victims unable to live with family shame and mental trauma. This policy of targeting also applied to Tamils living outside the conflict zone.  Apart from mass deportations, selective terror campaigns were carried out by means of abductions, assassinations, arbitrary arrests, detention, sexual assault and torture.

             The tribunal insists that the charges of genocide require further investigation, whereas the U.N. Panel on Sri Lanka restricts itself to allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity.  The U.N. fails to view the conflict in Sri Lanka as an ethnic issue as it does not recognize the Tamils’ struggle for statehood or the Tamils as a nationality with a genuine need to protect itself from extermination.  Sri Lanka’s war crimes are only a part of ethnic cleansing of Tamils over the last 60 years.

             The Sinhala rulers on assuming power from the British in 1948 began the systematic oppression of Tamils in all aspects of life.

(1) One million Tamils were excluded from citizenship and rendered stateless by the citizenship Act 18 of 1948.  Act 48 of 1949 denied the right to vote enjoyed by the Tamils until then.

(2) Tamil homelands in the North and East were deliberately colonized by Sinhalese with state funds, but were excluded from all development projects.

(3) The Sinhala Only Act of 1958 and Standardization Act of the same year deprived Tamils of higher education, employment opportunities, professional opportunities and all  public office thereby consolidating the racial discrimination.

(4) Thousands of Tamils were killed in racial violence let loose by the Sinhala rulers in 1956, 1958, 1974, 1976, and 1977 against innocent Tamils. There was widespread looting, arson, rape, torture, burning people alive, destroying property and centers of cultural importance - all planned and executed by racist Sinhala Governments.

(5) The state sponsored violence against Tamils in August 1977 forced more than 50,000 Tamils to migrate to northern part of Eelam and to several other countries including India.

(6) Burning of Jaffna Library in 1981 and the massacre of Tamils detained in Welikkede Prison determined armed struggle as the only course available for the Tamils for their liberation.

Is Sri Lanka an anti-imperialist state? :

             Sri Lanka, which calls itself as a ‘Socialist Democratic Republic’, was the first country in South Asia to open itself for globalization in 1976, and amended its economic policy accordingly.  Recently, the Sri Lanka Govt. has evacuated poor people from neighborhoods around Colombo to offer lands for multi-national companies.

             Active military collobaration between the ‘anti-imperialist’ Sri Lanka and United States has been going on  for more than two decades.  The United States of America has been arming and financing Sri Lanka for most of the civil war period. [www.cdi.org/PDFs/CSBillCharts.pdf ] From at least the 1990s, the US has provided military training, financing, logistic supplies and weapons sales worth millions annually. A Voice of America installation was set up in the northwestern part of the country.

            The Acquisition and Cross Servicing Agreement (ACSA ) was  signed soon after  Rajapaksa assumed power. It was U.S. citizen Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, Defense Minister, and brother to President Rajapaksa, who signed the agreement, March 5, 2007. Their younger brother, also a minister, is a US citizen too.) . ACSA will enable the United States to utilize Sri Lanka's ports, airports and air space. As a prelude to the signing of the agreement scheduled for July, this year, United States Naval ships have been calling at the Colombo Port for bunkering as well as to enable sailors to go on shore leave.

           In return for the facilities offered, Sri Lanka is to receive military assistance from the United States including increased training facilities and equipment. The training, which will encompass joint exercises with United States Armed Forces, will focus on counter terrorism and related activity. The agreement will be worked out on the basis of the use of Sri Lanka's ports, airports, and air space to be considered hire-charges that will be converted for military hardware.
(www.colombopage.com/archive_07/March5132506JV.html)

             Today, lands in the war-torn North and Eastern parts of the Island are shared among Indian and Chinese corporate companies.

             Sri Lanka is not a secular state as the constitution itself states that Buddhism is the foremost religion in the Island though there are people belonging to various other religions.

             “War on Terror” is a slogan borrowed by Sri Lanka from the U.S. to justify the genocidal war on Tamils, using sophisticated weapons of mass destruction supplied by the U.S., Israel, Japan, Italy, China and India.

Truth and the UNHRC Resolution dated 27 May 2009; The Current Situation:

              The U.N. Panel Report of 25 April 2011 is more than enough evidence to conclude that the UNHRC Resolution of 27 May 2009 is far removed from truth.  The magnitude of physical torture, psychological torture, disease, starvation and abuse of the Tamils survivors has few precedents in history.  It will be several generations before the Tamils recover from the horror of this war.  As with any war, women have borne the brunt – there are about 89,000 war widows in Eelam. Tamil women have been molested, sexually harassed and raped as part of the genocidal program so that they never return to normal life. The Sri Lankan army has taken upon itself the duty of not letting any humanitarian aid reach the Tamil survivors.  Deprived of food, water, medicine, medical services and other basic necessities, Tamils have been subject to several epidemics in the camps, leading to steady rise in death toll.  There were an estimated three hundred thousand Tamils in these modern day “concentration camps” immediately after the war.  The number has been dwindling by the day and two years after the war, though the govt. of Sri Lanka claims to have “let free” and “rehabilitated” Tamils, there is no evidence of resettlement; there is no information as to where these people were “resettled”. A state of emergency is still in vogue and the fear-gripped, psychologically tortured people in camps are still under the wrath of the Sri Lankan Army.

               We would like to call upon the ALBA countries and other radical governments of Latin America to reflect upon the situation prevailing in south Asia.  Countries that became independent after the Second World War including India (1947), Pakistan (1947) and Sri Lanka (1948) were under British rule for centuries.  The British ruled these countries inhabited by several Nationalities speaking different languages under a single administrative unit for their own convenience.  When these colonies became independent, people of different Nationalities were forced to remain under one state without recognition as separate Nationalities having separate homelands.  This improper decolonization led to fighting by different Nationalities for the retrieval of their right to self-rule.

                Just as the Tamils in Sri Lanka fighting for Eelam, their traditional homeland, there are other genuine Nationality struggles going on in Kashmir and the North Eastern states in India. Tamils and Punjabis are the potential Nationalities likely to rise in struggle sooner or later. With these realities in its backyard, the Indian government chose to assist the Sri Lanka Govt. in its war against the Liberation of Tamil Eelam. India let Sri Lanka use its satellites for surveillance, supplied sophisticated equipment including radars, technical assistance and billions of rupees in aid for the war against Eelam Tamils. India is well aware that a liberated Eelam state would not tolerate the dominance of the Indian state and its sway over Trincomalee, the strategically located natural port in Eelam territory. Liberation of Eelam could prove to be more than just precedence for Tamils in Tamil Nadu and other Nationalities in the Indian State. India has conveyed its message that it is capable of “nipping trouble in the bud” by deliberately taking part in the ethnic cleansing of Tamils in Sri Lanka.

                In the light of the above, we urge the radical governments of Latin America to demand that:

a) The UNHRC Resolution dated 27 May 2009 be removed from the UN records.

b) The struggle of Eelam Tamils is accepted as a liberation struggle for the retrieval of their Homelands.

c) The Sri Lankan govt. under Mahinda Rajapakse is investigated for genocidal crimes in the international court of justice.

d) The planned Sinhala colonization and the land-grab by multinational corporations in Eelam be stopped immediately

e) International media and International Human Rights activists are allowed entry into Sri Lankan territory to gain access to the truth which has not happened even two years after the end of the war

f) Rehabilitation and resettlement happen under the supervision of the UN Peacekeeping Force

g) These countries join hands with Eelam Tamil support groups across the world in demanding that the Eelam Tamils languishing in camps under horrific conditions be let free to return to their homes and all humanitarian assistance rendered to restore normalcy in their lives.

               We believe that the blossoming of Socialism in the Twenty First Century and its endurance will not be complete without the liberation of oppressed Nationalities of South Asia.  The Eelam Tamils have paid their dues for such liberation dearly and this would no doubt go down in history as the impotence of the left and radical forces.

                 Imperialism  has been successful in spreading the myth that 'Communism is dead' and 'There Is No Alternative'(TINA) to capitalism.  If we, as committed anti-imperialists fail to extend our solidarity for the democratic aspirations of  the peoples, it will only become a historic blunder of joining hands with imperialism to bury the ideology of communism. And we would like to remind here the saying of the great Internationalist Che Guevera:

     “The revolutionary [is] the ideological motor force of the revolution…if he forgets his proletarian internationalism, the revolution which he leads will cease to be an inspiring force and he will sink into a comfortable lethargy, which imperialism, our irreconcilable enemy, will utilize well. Proletarian internationalism is a duty, but it is also a revolutionary necessity. So we educate our people,”   

 The U.N. Panel Report on Sri Lanka released on April 25, 2011 gives us an opportunity to recognize the just struggle of Eelam Tamils for their self determination and to restore the dignity of International Humanitarian Laws.  Cuba and the other Latin American countries should now voice their support for Eelam Tamils and demonstrate their true International spirit handed down to them by Comrade Ernesto Che Guevera.

                We look forward to your cooperation in making this effort a success.  A line in reply would go a long way in forging our belief in Freedom.



In Solidarity,

Amarantha

for Latin American Friendship Association.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Madurai HC orders to remove barriers for opening Muthukumar Statue!


CHENNAI: Noting that the government cannot put fetters on a citizen’s right to make use of his own land in any manner without causing hindrance to anyone, the Madras high court permitted erection of a bust-size statue of K Muthukumar, who committed self-immolation in Chennai last year protesting the killing of Tamils in Sri Lanka.

Justice K Chandru, rejecting the government’s objections to the statue, said: "If the argument of the special government pleader is accepted, then for putting up the picture of one’s own parents or forefathers in private patta lands, they should move the authorities for permission. The government is trying to clutch a non-existing power."

The judge said: "Muthukumar, a Tamil youth abortively terminated his life for a cause which was dearer to him on January 29, 2009, at Chennai. The incident shocked the state. Muthukumar’s last testament was widely publicised in all newspapers. He was adored for the spirit of sacrifice."

The present petition was filed by P Maniarasan, general secretary of Thamizh Thesa Poduvudamai Katchi. He wanted to erect a bust-size statue of Muthukumar in a land exclusively belonging to a private person, at Sanoorapatti village in Thanjavur taluk. He approached the high court after the district authorities did not grant permission for the function.

While the petitioner contended that the government permission was not required for installing a statue on private property, the special government pleader submitted that without permission from the government, Maniarasan could not go ahead with the erection of the statue. He said Maniarasan should also provide land ownership details and must give an undertaking that the statue would be made of bronze. In future, if there is any hindrance to traffic, the statue should be removed from the existing place, he said.

Justice Chandru, rejecting the submissions, said: "Whether the statue should be made of clay or wood or stone or metal is to be left to the volition of the organisers. It may be the policy of the state that bronze statue alone should be erected in public places, lest any other forms are likely to be damaged by miscreants. But such ideas cannot be thrust upon to private citizens who set up memorial in their own lands." (Times of India)

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Decision to allow survey for construction of dam flayed



MADURAI: Farmers, farm labourers, workers and members of various Tamil nationalist parties and a few Dalit organisations came together here on Wednesday to protest against the decision of the Central Government to allow a survey for the construction of a new dam across the Mullaperiyar.

P. Maniarasan, general secretary, Tamil Desa Podhuvudamai Katchi, said that at a time when the Supreme Court had issued an order allowing the water level of the dam to be raised from the present 136 feet to 142 feet, the Kerala Government had not implemented it. This being the case, the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests had given “clearance” to conduct a survey for the construction of a new dam. This decision by the Centre was “highly condemnable,” he said. 

The effort was nothing but an attempt to see an involuntary lapse of the 999-year lease agreement signed during the British rule, in which the operating rights of the dam were given to the State of Tamil Nadu. Those who participated in the demonstration alleged that the Union Minister of State for Environment and Forest Jairam Ramesh’s decision to allow a survey and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister’s silence on the issue would be detrimental not only to farmers of five southern districts but also would result in scarcity of drinking water. 

Leaders of various agriculture and allied activity organisations claimed that as part of the protest they had planned to impede the movement of vehicles carrying food items and other essentials to Kerala.

போராட்டங்கள்

செய்திகள்

 
Copyright © 2013 Thamizh Thesiya Periyakkam
Design by FBTemplates | BTT